Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 333 Download : 255

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to look at how sacrifice affects value, how consumer attitudes affect value, how consumer attitudes affect consumer satisfaction, how consumer attitudes affect buying interest, how value affects consumer satisfaction, how value affects buying interest, and how consumer satisfaction affects buying interest. This study is a hypothesis-testing study using the survey method, as stated in the objectives. The study's target population is 100 people, which includes all Kediri Top Supermarket customers. Purposive sampling is the technique utilized. Pretest, validity and reliability, estimation, and structural model testing were the test instruments employed in this study. It employed Structural Equation Modeling to test it (SEM). The study's findings revealed that:  (1) Sacrifice had a significant effect on the value. (2) Consumer attitudes have a significant effect on the value. (3) Consumer attitudes have a significant effect on consumer buying interest. (4) The value has a significant effect on consumer satisfaction. (5) Consumer satisfaction has a significant effect on consumer buying interest.

Keywords

Consumer Attitude Value Consumer Satisfaction Interest

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Selviasari, R. ., & Ambarwati, D. . (2022). Analysis of Consumer Attitude, Value, Customer Satisfaction on Interest to Buy in Top Supermarkets. Economics and Digital Business Review, 3(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v3i2.174
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agustin, Tin dan Hang. (2012). Sikap Konsumen Terhadap Citra Toko Distro Inspired di Kota Malang, Jurnal Managemen dan Akuntansi, Volume 1, Nomor 1, April 2012.
  2. Barnes, J. G. (2011). Secret of Customer Relationship Management. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  3. Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.45.
  4. Chapman, J., & Wahlers, R. (1999). A Revision and Empirical Test of the Extended Price-Perceived Quality Model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501840.
  5. Cooper, Donald R, dan Pamela S. Schindler. (2006). Metode Riset Bisnis . Jakarta: PT Media Global Edukasi.
  6. Dharmmesta and Irawan, (2000). Modern Marketing Management, Edition II, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
  7. Ferdinand, Augusty. (2002). Pengembangan Minat Beli Merek Ekstensi. Semarang : Badan
  8. Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  9. Fornell, C. (1992). Satisfaction Barometer : Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 56(January), 6–21.
  10. Hair, dkk. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis Pearson International Edition 6. New Jersey.
  11. Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2004). The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: A study of online service dynamics. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002.
  12. Jogiyanto H.M. (2004). Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi, Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta.
  13. Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2003). A Customer Loyalty Model for E-Service Context. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 4(June), 156–167.
  14. Mowen, John C and Michael Minor. (2002). Consumer Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba.
  15. Nasution. (2004). Manajemen Jasa Terpadu. Jakarta : Ghalia.
  16. Sekaran, Uma. (2000). Research Methods for business: A Skill Building Approach.
  17. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  18. Sugiyono. (1999). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  19. Vitriani R. W. (1995). Hubungan Antara Harga Diri dengan Minat Membeli Pakaian Bermerk pada Remaja. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gajah Mada.